Wrongful Death Lawyers
We’ll help you through your grief with compassionate care. Count on us to seek justice and accountability.
We’ll help you through your grief with compassionate care. Count on us to seek justice and accountability.
Experienced attorneys at getting answers & securing accountability.
Your case is unique – and deserves special attention.
Expect a thorough investigation – and exceptional results.
In an instant, your world can be turned upside down with the loss of a loved one. Suffering the death of a spouse or family member is devastating and many times leaves survivors at a complete loss on how to move forward. If that loss was due to the negligence of another person, business or government agency, Arizona tort law allows the family of a deceased to seek justice and financial compensation through a wrongful death lawsuit. The law recognizes that the negligent person’s liability extends past the death of the deceased. In no way will financial compensation replace the loss of a loved one, but it may help ease the stress associated with the family’s financial burdens. The Lamber Goodnow injury team has years of experience advocating for clients in their efforts to hold those responsible for the deaths of their loved ones liable for their negligence.
When a person dies due to a wrongful act, neglect or misconduct of another, certain surviving members of the victim’s family may bring a wrongful death lawsuit in civil court. According to A.R.S. Section 12-611, a wrongful death suit may be brought to court if the deceased person could have filed a personal injury case based on the negligent or wrongful conduct that caused their death. Another way to look at a wrongful death claim is that it is akin to a personal injury case in which the injured person is no longer able to bring the case of their own behalf; therefore, certain family members may seek justice through a wrongful death claim.
In order to have a successful a wrongful death lawsuit, the family member initiating the lawsuit has the burden of establishing that the defendant acted negligently and that their negligence was the proximate cause of the death of their loved one. Proximate cause means an event that is sufficiently related to an injury to make the courts deem that the event is the cause of that injury.
Many wrongful death lawsuits follow criminal trials. Wrongful death lawsuits may use similar evidence as criminal trials, however, the standard of proof in a wrongful death civil trial is different than that of a criminal trial. In a criminal trial the prosecution must establish the wrongdoer’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the evidence against the wrongdoer is fully satisfied, that all the facts have been proven and that the guilt of the wrongdoer has been established. In a civil trial the family members must prove that the wrongdoer was responsible by a preponderance of the evidence. This means that the evidence that the family presents showing the wrongdoer’s negligence caused the death of their loved one was more probable than not. Additionally, a defendant found guilty in criminal court goes to prison, while a defendant found guilty in civil court must pay monetary damages. A person convicted of wrongful death may or may not be convicted of a crime associated with that death.
It is unfortunate that some accidents can cause catastrophic injuries, up to and including deaths.
When fatalities happen because of the negligence or intentional actions of other people or entities, certain family members of the decedents may file civil lawsuits against the parties that are responsible for causing the deaths of their loved ones. This area of law falls under tort law, and the lawsuits are civil actions. The attorneys at Lamber Goodnow can review your potential claim for catastrophic injuries or deaths and help you to understand your next steps. Here are the most common questions that we receive from people about cases involving the deaths of their loved ones.
Q: What is a wrongful death case?
A: A claim involving a death caused by negligence, recklessness, or intentional acts is a type of personal injury lawsuit that can be filed when someone is killed as a result of the actions of somebody else. Under A.R.S. § 12-611, the death of a person that is caused by the neglect or wrongful conduct of another person or entity gives rise to the ability to file a death action against the person or entity that is responsible. People are able to file lawsuits if the person who died would have been able to file a personal injury claim if he or she had not succumbed to his or her injuries. Historically, when people died, the ability to file tort claims for the wrongs that were done to them died with them. The common law did not recognize the ability of a person to file an action against someone else who was responsible for the death of a loved one. Legislatures across the U.S. recognized that this was inherently wrong and enacted statutes to allow certain family members to file lawsuits against the parties who are responsible for the deaths of their loved ones. This means that death actions in the U.S. are statutory creations. Like other states, Arizona has codified the ability to file this type of tort lawsuit in its statutory laws.
Q: Who is allowed to file a lawsuit involving a death?
A: A death action cannot be filed by just anyone. Under A.R.S. § 12-612, only specific people can file a lawsuit against a defendant who caused the death of their loved one. The lawsuit must be filed by and for the benefit of the following parties:
Q: Do you have to pay income taxes on awards or settlements in cases involving death?
A: According to the IRS in Publication 4345, damages for claims involving death are considered to be compensation for physical injuries. They are generally free from income tax for the survivors. However, it is important to note that if your loved one left a sizeable estate, damages in this type of lawsuit might push the value of the estate above the federal estate tax exemption. Arizona does not have an estate tax. The federal exemption may still apply if your loved one's estate was worth more than $11.18 million. Most people will not need to worry about this issue. If you receive punitive damages, you may be required to report them as income on your income tax return. Finally, if your settlement agreement contains a nondisclosure clause, the IRS can claim that it was bargained for and make all of the award subject to taxation. You should avoid signing an agreement that contains a nondisclosure clause unless you secure an agreement from the defendant that he or she will defend against the IRS and indemnify you if you are charged taxes on your settlement.
Q: What is the difference between a survival action and a death claim?
A: A survival action is distinct from a claim for wrongful death. Under A.R.S. § 14-3110, the personal representative of a decedent's estate can file a survival action against a defendant for a cause of action that the decedent could have filed if he or she had survived. However, survival actions do not allow for the recovery of pain and suffering damages or for loss of consortium. Survival actions have to be brought by the estate of the deceased person rather than by a family member unless the family member is also the personal representative of the estate. The lawsuit is for the benefit of the estate. When a settlement or verdict award is secured in a survival action, the proceeds will be deposited with the estate. When the estate is distributed among the estate beneficiaries, the money will ultimately benefit each of them. Survival actions are brought on behalf of the deceased person for his or her personal losses. A death action is brought on behalf of the surviving family members to recover their own losses. In some cases, it is possible for there to be grounds to file both a death claim and a survival action.
Q: Who is responsible for paying damages in a settlement involving a death?
A: When a lawsuit is filed against a defendant for the death of your loved one, the insurance company for the defendant will normally be responsible for paying the damages that are agreed to in a settlement or that are awarded by a jury. For example, if your loved one was killed in an accident involving a commercial truck, the trucking company's insurance carrier will likely be responsible for paying the damages. If your loved one was killed in an accident with another motorist, the at-fault driver's insurance company will be responsible for paying any damages that you are able to recover up to the policy limits. If your loved one was killed because of a defective product, the manufacturer, designer, and others that were involved in the chain of production may be responsible for paying damages. In some cases, the defendants will not have sufficient insurance coverage to pay the damages that are awarded. It is possible to go after the defendants' assets to try to secure payment for any damages that the insurance companies do not cover. In most cases, however, the recovery will be limited to the policy limits of the available insurance policies.
Q: What types of damages are available in an action involving a death?
A: The damages that might be available in a case involving death can be divided into special and general damages. Special damages are the actual pecuniary losses that you have suffered because of the death of your loved one and might include the following types:
Q: What are the most common types of cases involving deaths that are wrongful?
A: Death actions can arise in many different situations. Some of the most common types include the following:
Q: Can colleges or universities be liable for college student murders?
A: Whether a university or college might be liable for the murder of a college student will be fact-dependent. In some cases, an institution of higher education may be liable when a murder occurs. For example, if the university provided inadequate security on campus or in a dormitory, it may be liable for a resulting death. A college might also be liable if it knew or had reason to know about a student's propensity for violence combined with threats to harm a particular student if it failed to warn the victim of the threats. The attorneys at Lamber Goodnow can analyze the facts to determine all of the parties that should be named as defendants to a lawsuit.
Q: What is the statute of limitations for filing a case involving a death?
A: All states have limitations periods within which actions must be filed. These limitations periods serve as time limits for filing lawsuits. If you fail to file a lawsuit within the statutory time period, you will lose your ability to file a claim to recover damages. Under A.R.S. § 12-542, a civil lawsuit for the death of a loved one must be filed within two years of when the death occurs. It is important to note that while you have two years to file a lawsuit for the death of your loved one, it is best for you to talk to an attorney much sooner instead of waiting until you are close to the end of the limitations period. Getting help soon after your loved one's accident and death can help to preserve evidence that could otherwise be lost as time passes. It can also give your lawyer more time to conduct a thorough investigation so that the claim might be stronger than it might be if you wait.
Q: Why file a civil action when a criminal case is pending?
A: Some people do not understand why they should file a civil lawsuit against a defendant who is responsible for the death of their loved one when there is already a criminal case pending against the defendant. There are a couple of reasons why it is important for you to file a civil lawsuit regardless of whether a criminal case has been filed. Criminal cases have a higher burden of proof. Prosecutors are required to prove that the defendants are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. By contrast, plaintiffs in civil cases must prove that the defendants were more likely than not to have committed the offense. This means that it may be possible for you to prevail in your civil claim against the person or entity that is responsible for causing your loved one's death even if the defendant is not criminally charged or is found not guilty in his or her criminal case. A famous example of this is the O.J. Simpson case. While Simpson was found not guilty in his criminal case for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson, he was found to be responsible in the civil lawsuit that was filed by her family and by the family of Ronald Goldman. Filing a civil lawsuit can help you to hold the defendant accountable for his or her actions.
An example of this is former football star O.J. Simpson. In Simpson’s 1995 criminal case he was found not guilty of all murder charges of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. In a civil wrongful death case brought by the Goldman family, however, Simpson was found liable for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. Simpson was ordered to pay the families $33.5 million.
Our Phoenix-based personal injury attorneys invest considerable time, expense and resources when it comes to establishing negligence in wrongful death lawsuits. We regularly work with leading experts in fields such as accident reconstruction to establish negligence and liability.
We know that this investment is crucial in presenting the most favorable case when approaching an insurance company for settlement or presenting to a fact finder.
In order to bring a successful wrongful death claim in Arizona, the following elements must be present:
Additionally, under A.R.S. Section 12-612, there must be surviving family members or a personal representative for the decedent’s estate that can legally bring the wrongful death claim.
Under A.R.S. Section 12-612(A), an action for wrongful death shall be brought by and in the name of the surviving:
Additionally, either parent may maintain a wrongful death action for the death of a child.
Under Arizona law, however, if any family member who would have been eligible to file a wrongful death lawsuit or benefit from damages awarded by a wrongful death lawsuit, is found guilty under A.R.S. Section 13-3623 (child or vulnerable adult abuse), or A.R.S. Sections 13-1103-1105 (manslaughter, second degree murder and first-degree murder), the law treats the family member as having predeceased the decedent and therefore disqualifies them from recovering benefits. This portion of the Arizona wrongful death law eliminates a loophole that, in the past, had allowed family members who had caused the wrongful death to benefit from a wrongful death lawsuit.
The Lamber Goodnow legal team evaluates the details of each wrongful death case to make sure that each family is receiving the damages that they deserve. In Arizona, the current recommended jury instructions list the elements of damages that may be recovered in a wrongful death action. A jury may award an amount to compensate the decedent’s beneficiaries for the following:
A.R.S Section 12-613 describes the damages that can be awarded in a wrongful death action. The section does three things. First, it gives the jury broad discretion to award whatever damages to the plaintiffs that the jury “deems fair and just.” Second, it allows the jury to consider in determining damages any “mitigating or aggravating circumstances” of the act causing the wrongful death. Third, the plaintiff’s recovery is not offset by any “debts or liabilities of the deceased” unless the action is brought by the personal representative solely on behalf of the decedent’s estate.
In some wrongful death cases, punitive damages may be awarded. The purpose of punitive damages is to punish the party responsible for the wrongful death and to discourage similar behavior in the future. Punitive damages may be awarded if the negligent act is considered especially reckless or egregious.
Under A.R.S Section 12-612(C), the amount recovered in a wrongful death action shall be distributed to the parties in proportion to their damages. If the recovery is on the behalf of the decedent’s estate, the amount shall be an asset of the estate, which would be distributed pursuant to the decedent’s will or the intestacy statutes.
Although the family may receive an award of damages in a wrongful death case, their damages may also be reduced by certain actions that occurred during the decedent’s life. An example is if a husband abused his wife while she was alive. This may be shown to reduce damages because it may prove that the husband did not suffer as a result of her wrongful death.
The courts have addressed a number of factors which may reduce the amount of damages the beneficiaries receive in a wrongful death action. Arizona law, however, provides that evidence of remarriage of a surviving spouse is not admissible to reduce damages. The reason behind this rule is that a defendant should not benefit from the fact that a surviving spouse has remarried.
A survival statute preserves an injured party’s right to recover for personal injury after the victim dies. In a survival action the victim’s estate assumes the victim’s claim against the negligent party. Survival statutes vary from state to state, but they generally allow the estate to sue for damages, pain and suffering, but not wrongful death. A survival action is completely separate from a wrongful death action and arises out of the original injury and not out of death.
Under A.R.S. Section 14-3110, the estate may sue for every cause of action, except:
The purpose of providing both causes of action is to give and preserve to the parties damaged, a complete remedy and an opportunity to recover the complete loss sustained because of the wrongful injury or death.
The Lamber Goodnow Phoenix injury team has experience litigating both wrongful death and survival claims and will work closely with our clients to make sure the correct action is taken in order to get our clients the remedies they deserve.
According to the IRS Publication 4345, wrongful death suits are under the same category as personal injury settlements. Both of these are generally non-taxable since they are seen as compensatory—or refunding the person for money lost. Any monies that were received due to a physical injury and as a consequence caused emotional or mental hardship, those are then labeled as medical expenses are compensatory and therefore are non-taxable.
There are conditions, however, in which medical expenses are taxable. If the medical expense amount had already been labeled as a deduction in any prior tax returns, then the settlement must be labeled as income.
Any punitive damage monies received are not categorized as compensatory and instead are seen as financial awards which must be reported as “other income” on line 21 of Form 1040 in your taxes. Punitive damages are monies that go beyond the medical costs incurred due to the accident and wrongful death.
The Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 amended 26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2) to provide that damages (other than punitive damages) received under a judgment or settlement of a claim for personal injury or sickness are excludible from gross income. The legislative history of the 1996 Act makes clear that this exception includes income received from a wrongful death claim.
Every state has certain deadlines in which a family or an estate must file a lawsuit over a wrongful death. These deadlines are called a statute of limitations because it is a time deadline set by state law. The deadline from a wrongful death lawsuit to be filed is not affected by any criminal case that may also be filed in relation to the death.
Many courts believe that if the application of the limitation period would destroy the cause of action before it can be discovered the discovery rule should be applied.
The discovery rule states that the running of a limitations period in a wrongful death action begins when the party that is bringing the lawsuit discovers, or should have discovered through reasonable diligence, the cause of the decedent’s death. Arizona applies the discovery rule.
The National Safety Council estimates that in 2016, more than 40,000 people lost their lives in motor vehicle accidents.
In Arizona, 962 people were killed in motor vehicle accidents during 2016 according to the Arizona Department of Transportation.
Wrongful death lawsuits may arise from various types of vehicle accidents including:
Although meeting with an experienced Phoenix wrongful death attorney is imperative if your loved one has been killed due to the negligence of another, it is also important that you have resources in order to educate yourself on the negligence of others.
Why You Would Need an Attorney Following the Loss of a Loved One in an Accident
The Lamber-Goodnow Injury Law Team is compassionate and prepared to develop customized strategies in cases involving workplace accidents, fatal car accidents, fatal truck accidents, poisoning, product defects, fires, murder and general negligence. Our Phoenix-based wrongful death attorneys thoroughly investigate cases in Arizona and throughout the Southwest. We examine the circumstances, determining what happened, who is liable and what should have been done to prevent the accident.
The legal processes involved in these matters can be lengthy and complex, requiring significant investigation and case preparation. We thoroughly explore all evidence and handle all circumstances that may arise during litigation. It is critical that you speak with an experienced attorney before agreeing to anything with an insurance company representative or third party.
Our attentive and individualized approach offers comfort and confidence to families that have experienced deep loss, and we are recognized for our results-oriented approach.
For a free consultation, Contact us online or call our firm at (602) 274-9662 or (800) 283-2652. We can help you move closer to recovery and justice today.
 Mullen v. Posada Del Sol Health Care Center, 169 Ariz. 399, 819 P.2d 985 (App. 1991).
 Sedillo v. City of Flagstaff, 153 Ariz. 478, 737 P.2d 1377 (App. 1987).
 Barragan v. Superior Court, 12 Ariz.App. 402, 470 P.2d 722 (1970).
 Quinonez v. Anderson, 144 Ariz. 193, 696 P.2d 1342 (App. 1985).
 Taylor v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 130 Ariz. 516, 637 P.2d 726 (1981).
 H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-737, 104th Cong. 2d Sess., 301 (1996).
 Rogers v. Smith Kline & French Laboratories, 5 Ariz. App. 553, 429 P.2d 4 (1967).
 Lawhon v. L.B.J. Institutional Supply, 159 Ariz. 179, 765 P.2d 1003 (App. 1988) (cause of action does not accrue until plaintiff knows he has been negligently injured by a particular defendant).
Contact us online or call our firm at 602-ARIZONA (274-9662) or 800-ATEAM-LAW (283-2652) toll free. We can help you move closer to recovery and justice today.